Problem:
The literature review should explain job satisfaction thoroughly, as well as provide thorough reviews of the five to seven instruments used to measure it. This is slightly different from other literature reviews, whereby the idea is to review and critique the study and findings. For this literature review the researcher is not reviewing the study but rather are reviewing and critiquing the instrument based on what studies and other researchers have found. The idea here is to review the instrument and its usefulness in measuring job satisfaction. Thus, what does the instrument measure, how reliable and valid is it, and what are its strengths and weaknesses? What is lacking in the instrument which paves the way for the necessity of your newly developed instrument? How are these instruments different from what you will develop?
Include the following in your literature review:
A discussion of job satisfaction as a construct of interest.
A thorough discussion of each instrument you review for job satisfaction construct, including the name of the test, what the test is used for, whether the test is appropriate for this area, what the reliability and validity of the test is, and what reviewers say about the strengths and weaknesses of it with regard to assessing this construct
What, in general, appears to be adequately assessed on each test with respect to the job satisfaction construct that you selected? Need Assignment Help?
What does not appear to be adequately assessed?
The literature review should justify development of an assessment-is there a hole in what is currently being assessed that the researcher can fill with the test? Make a case for why the proposed test would address an area that is not already well assessed.