--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Zero Sum Games

A “winner-take-all” game of poker is an illustration of a: (w) positive-sum game. (x) negative-sum game. (y) zero-sum game. (z) non-zero sum game.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Game Theory

  • Q : NOT including competition in

    Illustrations of cooperative games do not comprise: (1) collective bargaining, in which the firms and unions bargain over employment. (2) international treaties that regulate trade. (3) pure competition. (4) plea bargaining between prosecutors and def

    		•
  • Q : Game Theory and Strategic Behavior Game

    Game theory focuses upon: (w) professional athletics. (x) strategic behavior among rivals. (y) competition among board game designers. (z) economic interpretations of political behavior. Hello guys I want your advi

    		•
  • Q : Study of independent decision Game

    Game theory is about the study of: (w) the utility maximizing behavior of individuals. (x) strategic interactions between interdependent decision makers. (y) independent decision making process of an individual firm. (z) the policy making process of a

    		•
  • Q : Follow dominant strategy If Venezuela

    If Venezuela and Indonesia could enforce an agreement not to cheat onto OPEC’s cartel quotas: (w) their earnings would be constant since the dominant strategy for both is to not cheat. (x) their earnings would be higher than while they followed the dominant stra

    		•
  • Q : Gain by implementing a first decision A

    A firm which can gain by implementing a first decision before any other firms act has a: (w) predatory pricing strategy. (x) controlling market share. (y) first mover advantage. (z) dominance strategy. Hey friends please give your

    		•
  • Q : Tit-for-tat behavior for games

    John and Amy have agreed to divide any fudge left over after today. Every time Amy eats a piece of fudge today and also John does, vice versa as well. Their tactics are termed as: (1) grim strategy. (2) tit-for-tat behavior. (3) copy-cat behavior. (4) echoing tactics.

    		•
  • Q : Grim Strategy When Tia would respond by

    When Tia would respond by never again cooperating within a long sequence of repeated transaction when Carmen ever failed to cooperate, in that case Tia would be following: (1) Nash equilibrium. (2) tit-for-tat. (3) domino strategy. (4) grim strategy. (5) cut-throat co

    		•
  • Q : Problem on Nash equilibrium Alyssa and

    Alyssa and Ben are trying to decide where to go to the football game or to the play. But Alyssa prefers the play and Ben the ball game, although they’d prefer to do somewhat together. The Nash equilibrium is: (w) Alyssa goes to the play and Ben

    		•
  • Q : Problem on Negative Sum Games The

    The bloody American Civil War [from 1861 to 1865] is an illustration of a/an: (1) essential evil. (2) moral hazard. (3) predatory game. (4) involuntary intergenerational transfer. (5) negative sum game. I need a good answer on the

    		•
  • Q : Example of a second mover strategy An

    An instance of a second mover strategy would be a: (1) baseball manager waiting till the other team's manager inserts a pinch hitter before selecting a relief pitcher. (2) firm's decision to lay-off workers. (3) union going on strike while a labor con

    		•