--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Tit-for-Tat in Dynamic Games

Assume that Kevin and Margeaux play a repeated game in that they can choose to act either cooperatively or non cooperatively. When on the third round, Kevin reacts cooperatively and Margeaux react uncooperatively: (1) and both use tit-for-tat strategy, Kevin will react cooperatively on the fourth round, although only on the fourth round, unless Margeaux acts cooperatively upon the fourth round. (2) Kevin will never trust Margeaux again and will always thereafter act uncooperatively. (3) and both use tit-for-tat strategy, this is possible they will never both cooperate again on the same round. (4) and both use grim strategy, Kevin will perform cooperatively on the fourth round and Margeaux will act uncooperatively.

Please choose the right answer from above...I want your suggestion for the same.

   Related Questions in Game Theory

  • Q : Problem regarding Prisoners’ Dilemma

    The District Attorney has Car Jacker and also Cat Burglar nailed for possession of stolen goods after a long crime spree. Now the DA separately gives them the options in this pay-off matrix. Even though these offers operate only once, when Car Jacker and Cat Burglar a

    		•
  • Q : Example of a positive-sum game An

    An illustration of a positive-sum game could be: wa) trade between two countries according to the law of comparative advantage. (x) a robbery in which $1000 changes hands and no one is hurt. (y) a robbery in which $1000 changes hands and the mugger is

    		•
  • Q : Tit-for-Tat behavior The tit-for-tat

    The tit-for-tat behavior that frequently emerges in an infinitely repeated game may be summarized as do unto others like: (w) they most recently did unto you. (x) you would have them do unto you. (y) before they do unto you. (z) they have ever done un

    		•
  • Q : Dominant strategies ACE and BEST are

    ACE and BEST are the only two grocery stores into a remote small town within North Dakota. The owners as each other very small, and trust each other even less. When they cooperate the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice will never know. Specified this

    		•
  • Q : Prisoner's dilemma game theory This

    This payoff matrix as in demonstrated figure for two countries that belong to the OPEC cartel exemplifies: (w) a prisoner's dilemma game. (x) a game in which neither participant has a dominant strategy. (y) why neither country will cheat as a dominant

    		•
  • Q : Problem about Asymmetric Information A

    A large firm knows own costs and the costs of its rival. However a smaller rival firm knows its own costs although is unaware of costs of larger firm. The larger firm is likely to gain due to: (1) industrial concentration. (2) a dominant strategy. (3) predatory practi

    		•
  • Q : Different charging in Nash equilibrium

    Red Hat wants to increase the power of Linux to attract Windows users. Microsoft is planning Windows Minus, a weaker version to compete with Linux. Each can sell low, medium, or high powered versions of the new software, but each consequently must charge higher, mediu

    		•
  • Q : Problem regarding to zero sum games

    Making a bet within an office pool on this year’s Kentucky Derby is an illustration of a: (w) positive-sum game. (x) negative-sum game. (y) zero-sum game. (z) tit-for-tat game. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation fo

    		•
  • Q : Exemplify Zero-Sum Game Making a bet

    Making a bet within an office pool on this year's Super Bowl is an illustration of a: (w) positive-sum game. (x) negative-sum game. (y) zero-sum game. (z) communal sacrifice. I need a good answer on the topic of Economics <

    		•
  • Q : Asymmetric Information If two firms

    If two firms considering a possible merger have unequal levels of knowledge regarding issues in their negotiations: (w) potential abuses of asymmetric information exist. (x) the payoff matrix is invariably asymmetric. (y) the more knowledgeable negotiator will gain by

    		•