--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Tit-for-Tat in Dynamic Games

Assume that Kevin and Margeaux play a repeated game in that they can choose to act either cooperatively or non cooperatively. When on the third round, Kevin reacts cooperatively and Margeaux react uncooperatively: (1) and both use tit-for-tat strategy, Kevin will react cooperatively on the fourth round, although only on the fourth round, unless Margeaux acts cooperatively upon the fourth round. (2) Kevin will never trust Margeaux again and will always thereafter act uncooperatively. (3) and both use tit-for-tat strategy, this is possible they will never both cooperate again on the same round. (4) and both use grim strategy, Kevin will perform cooperatively on the fourth round and Margeaux will act uncooperatively.

Please choose the right answer from above...I want your suggestion for the same.

   Related Questions in Game Theory

  • Q : Second Mover Strategy Assume that a car

    Assume that a car dealer tries to acquire a prospective buyer to “tell me your highest probable offer for this car, and we will see when that’s acceptable,” although a customer insists, “I will decide whether to buy after you make your lowest p

    		•
  • Q : Example of a second mover strategy An

    An instance of a second mover strategy would be a: (1) baseball manager waiting till the other team's manager inserts a pinch hitter before selecting a relief pitcher. (2) firm's decision to lay-off workers. (3) union going on strike while a labor con

    		•
  • Q : Prisoner's dilemma game theory This

    This payoff matrix as in demonstrated figure for two countries that belong to the OPEC cartel exemplifies: (w) a prisoner's dilemma game. (x) a game in which neither participant has a dominant strategy. (y) why neither country will cheat as a dominant

    		•
  • Q : Competitive prices and efficiency and

    When all industries were purely competitive and externalities were not present and when the distribution of income was viewed as fair by consensus of the population, in that case the marginal value to society of an extra unit of a goo

    		•
  • Q : Illustration of Nash equilibrium As per

    As per this payoff matrix in demonstrated figure, Alyssa going to the football game when Ben attended the play cannot be Nash equilibrium since: (w) they’d each gain the most possible when Ben watched football when Alyssa went to the play. (x) b

    		•
  • Q : Application of game theory Within the

    Within the application of game theory, in that case the payoff is: (w) the game’s outcome. (x) the rival firm’s actions. (y) a consequence only of one firm’s actions. (z) is always uncertain. How

    		•
  • Q : Problem regarding Prisoners’ Dilemma

    The District Attorney has Car Jacker and also Cat Burglar nailed for possession of stolen goods after a long crime spree. Now the DA separately gives them the options in this pay-off matrix. Even though these offers operate only once, when Car Jacker and Cat Burglar a

    		•
  • Q : Result of prisoners’ dilemma game When

    When Car Jacker knows about that Cat Burglar has connections inside the prison and will have him killed when he implicates Cat Burglar, the probable result of this prisoners’ dilemma game is that: (i) neither prisoner squeals and they each serve

    		•
  • Q : Strategies of companies in go to

    In this payoff matrix for the location strategies of companies, when BEST locates first: (w) both companies will go to location 1. (x) both companies will go to location 2. (y) this will go to location 1 and ACE will go to location 2. (z) this will go to location 2 an

    		•
  • Q : Strategy game theory of Tit for Tat

    Garbanzo lowers the price for its salad buffet. Pinto’s, a close by rival restaurant, in that case lowers its price for its salad buffet, a near substitute. If Garbanzo notices it, then the manager lowers the price again. It trend continues. Such restaurants are

    		•