--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Illustration of Nash equilibrium

As per this payoff matrix in demonstrated figure, Alyssa going to the football game when Ben attended the play cannot be Nash equilibrium since: (w) they’d each gain the most possible when Ben watched football when Alyssa went to the play. (x) by both going to the play or both to the ball game, they are both better off. (y) attending the play generates disutility for Ben. (z) Ben hates the concept of going to the play, as well as Alyssa hates the crowd noise in football games.

1880_Nash Equilibrium.png

How can I solve my Economics problem? Please suggest me the correct answer.

   Related Questions in Game Theory

  • Q : Problem regarding to zero sum games

    Making a bet within an office pool on this year’s Kentucky Derby is an illustration of a: (w) positive-sum game. (x) negative-sum game. (y) zero-sum game. (z) tit-for-tat game. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation fo

    		•
  • Q : Game theory implication with Nash

    This payoff matrix in given figure for a two person game needs players to choose that event to attend, and indicates which: (w) Ben would rather attend each event than alone with Alyssa. (x) No matter what Alyssa chooses Ben prefers attending the play to attending the

    		•
  • Q : Grim Strategy When Tia would respond by

    When Tia would respond by never again cooperating within a long sequence of repeated transaction when Carmen ever failed to cooperate, in that case Tia would be following: (1) Nash equilibrium. (2) tit-for-tat. (3) domino strategy. (4) grim strategy. (5) cut-throat co

    		•
  • Q : Example of Nash equilibrium In this

    In this payoff matrix as in demonstrated figure, when the wife gets to choose first: (w) she will watch the film and her husband will play golf. (x) she will play golf and her husband will go to the movies. (y) they will both play golf. (z) they will both go to the th

    		•
  • Q : NOT including competition in

    Illustrations of cooperative games do not comprise: (1) collective bargaining, in which the firms and unions bargain over employment. (2) international treaties that regulate trade. (3) pure competition. (4) plea bargaining between prosecutors and def

    		•
  • Q : Tit-for-tat behavior for games

    John and Amy have agreed to divide any fudge left over after today. Every time Amy eats a piece of fudge today and also John does, vice versa as well. Their tactics are termed as: (1) grim strategy. (2) tit-for-tat behavior. (3) copy-cat behavior. (4) echoing tactics.

    		•
  • Q : Problem on positive sum game When two

    When two countries decide to involve in trade because of comparative advantage: (w) one country will gain more than the other. (x) there should be completely free trade for both countries to benefit. (y) the overall consequences for all consumers can be explained as a

    		•
  • Q : Repeating game in Nash equilibrium In

    In Nash equilibrium for a repeating game, there the participants: (i) share potential gains in proportion to the relative sizes of the two parties. (ii) are harmed by the prisoners’ dilemma. (iii) have both adopted their respective dominant posi

    		•
  • Q : Illustration of Prisoners ‘Dilemma The

    The District Attorney has Car Jacker as well as Cat Burglar nailed for possession of stolen goods after a long crime spree. Now the DA separately offers them the options within this pay-off matrix. The probably result is for: (1) Car Jacker to serve only two years bec

    		•
  • Q : Zero Sum Games A “ winner-take-all ”

    A “winner-take-all” game of poker is an illustration of a: (w) positive-sum game. (x) negative-sum game. (y) zero-sum game. (z) non-zero sum game. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given

    		•