When all state sold the lot it was argued that alabamas


Alabama Outdoor Advertising Co., Inc., leased part of a lot from All State Linen Service Co. to erect a commercial advertising sign. The term of the lease was for "indefinite years, beginning 1st day of January, 1973, and ending year to year thereafter."

When All State sold the lot, it was argued that Alabama's lease was a tenancy at will and therefore came to an end when the lot was sold. Do you agree with this argument? Why or why not?

Industrial Mach., Inc., v. Creative Displays, Inc., 344 So.2d 743 (AL).

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Management Theories: When all state sold the lot it was argued that alabamas
Reference No:- TGS02176106

Expected delivery within 24 Hours