Stereograms, revisited. Because of the skewness of the distributions of fusion times described in Exercise 41, we might consider a re-expression. Here are the boxplots of the log of fusion times. Is it better to analyze the original fusion times or the log fusion times? Explain.
Exercise 41
Stereograms. Stereograms appear to be composed entirely of random dots. However, they contain separate images that a viewer can "fuse" into a three-dimensional (3D) image by staring at the dots while defocusing the eyes. An experiment was performed to determine whether knowledge of the embedded image affected the time required for subjects to fuse the images. One group of subjects (group NV) received no information or just verbal information about the shape of the embedded object. A second group (group VV) received both verbal information and visual information (specifically, a drawing of the object). The experimenters measured how many seconds it took for the subject to report that he or she saw the 3D image.
a) What two variables are discussed in this description?
b) For each variable, is it quantitative or categorical? If quantitative, what are the units?
c) The boxplots compare the fusion times for the two treatment groups. Write a few sentences comparing these distributions. What does the experiment show?
