Problem: One objection to interventionism is that it is pointless to talk about intervening in nature since the required technology does not exist. The counter-reply to this position is that talking about it now is important because a. it will spur us to develop the relevant technology more quickly b. developing the relevant technology could reduce the death and suffering of trillions of animals c. talking about it now might prevent future generations from thinking interventionism is ridiculous d. establishing a consensus in favor of interventionism ahead of time will help ensure that the right thing is done as soon as possible. e. All of the above are correct f. None of the above is correct. Need Assignment Help?