Problem:
Respond to the postings of at least two other classmates. Norm and criterion-referenced tests both serve their own purposes in education. The two are used differently to measure a student's learning success and their level of development. A norm-referenced test compares a child's performance to that of a larger group. A good example of this would be the SAT or basic IQ tests. These types of tests show how a child is doing compared to others or the "norm" group. They compare whether the student performed higher or lower than the original group. In comparison, the criterion-referenced tests measure a child's performance against a set standard and not against another student. These types of tests are usually used to check the results of class instruction. Although they are different, both are still useful in measuring a child's education. I personally believe that criterion-referenced tests are more helpful than norm-referenced tests. Criterion-referenced tests are useful because all children develop at different times, and sometimes their progress should not be compared to one another. By only focusing on the test results that were compared to another child, you can discredit a child's self-growth. Each child has been created uniquely and should not be competing against one another. By using criterion-referenced tests, we can take a look at the child as a whole and see how they are doing compared to the standard, and then measure their success from previous tests. Need Assignment Help?