Thomas Kuhn claims that “…[n]o process yet disclosed by the historical study of scientific development at all resembles the methodological stereotype of falsification by direct comparison with nature…” Is Kuhn agreeing with Popper? Please explain your answer clearly and thoroughly. Please compare and contrast the philosophies of science defended by Popper and Kuhn. What do they say about progress in the history of science? What is meant by the problem of demarcation? What would Popper and Kuhn say about Bacon’s remark that in connection with the “…[t]wo ways of searching into and discovering the truth…,” the correct “but as yet untried” way “…derives axioms from the senses and particulars, rising by a gradual and unbroken ascent, so that it arrives at the most general axioms last of all….” Please show that you have analyzed and understood Wolff’s chapter on the philosophy of science.