Assignment:
As an educator, you will apply various learning principles in your academic and professional work. It's important to recognize that different principles have their strengths and limitations, and some may be more effective in certain contexts than others. Chapter 4 in your textbook describes 25 of these learning principles. Need Assignment Help?
Please choose one principle from the chapter that you find particularly interesting or relevant to your own learning experience, and then complete the following:
Make an argument in favor of your chosen principle, providing reasons or examples of how this principle has been effective in promoting your learning.
Make an argument against your chosen principle, providing reasons or examples of why this principle may not be effective or may even hinder learning.
Twenty-Five Principles Of Learning From Cognitive Science
Some principles of learning apply universally to the human mind. (Many of these apply to the minds of other species as well.) They transcend the environment, the technology, the setting, student demographics, and instructor characteristics. They go beyond course content and focus more on how students receive and work with that content. Indeed, they drive and sustain the whole process of learning. Therefore, they should guide online course design, treatment of the content, selection of teaching and assessment methods, and feedback to students.
When online learning surpasses classroom learning, it is not the technology itself but the course design, time on task, and student engagement with the content that account for the better outcomes (Means, Bakia, & Murphy, 2014). These findings hold even for courses with rich media, which can interfere with learning if overdone, misaligned, or poorly designed (Mayer, 2009). Faculty, of course, control the course design, student-content interaction, and media use (Sun & Chen, 2016).
Cognitive psychological research has generated or supported all of the following principles. Multimedia research and the teaching and learning literature have produced several corollaries of these principles.
1. Students learn procedures and processes best when they learn the steps in the same order that they will perform them (Feldon, 2010).
2. Students learn new material better and can remember it longer when they learn it by engaging in an activity than when they passively watch or listen to an instructor talk (Bligh, 2000; Bonwell & Eison, 1991; Deslauriers, Schelew, & Wieman, 2011; Hake, 1998; Jones-Wilson, 2005; Spence, 2001; Svinicki, 2004; Swiderski, 2005). Because interacting with others demands active engagement, we add this corollary from Persellin and Daniels (2014), even though it derives from the classroom-based teaching and learning literature rather than cognitive psychology: small-group work and discussion engage students, allowing them to construct knowledge actively on their own (Stage, Kinzie, Muller, & Simmons, 1999).
3. Students learn from practice, but only when they receive targeted feedback that they can use to improve their performance in further practice (Ambrose, Bridges, DiPietro, Lovett, & Norman, 2010). Of course, they must first read and accurately interpret that feedback, which they do not always do.
4. Students relate new material to their prior knowledge about it, which highlights the importance of the validity and the organization of that prior knowledge (Ambrose et al., 2010; Baume & Baume, 2008; Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 1999; Taylor & Kowalski, 2014).
5. Students learn best and most easily when they feel they are in a safe, low-stress, supportive, welcoming environment (Ambrose et al., 2010; Doyle & Zakrajsek, 2018). They are more likely to achieve the learning outcomes of the course, develop higher-order thinking skills, participate in class activities, behave appropriately in class, be motivated to learn, and be satisfied with the course, whether classroom based (Cornelius-White, 2007; Granitz, Koernig, & Harich, 2009) or online (Lundberg & Sheridan, 2015).
6. Some qualities attract and hold students' attention and focus and therefore help students learn new material better and remember it longer: human faces, color, intensity, extreme contrasts, movement, change, drama, instructor enthusiasm, and personal relevance (Ambrose et al., 2010; Bransford et al., 1999; Hobson, 2002; Persellin& Daniels, 2014; Svinicki, 2004; Winne & Nesbit, 2010).
7. Students learn and store new material-that is, move it from working memory into long-term memory-through elaborative rehearsal, which means thinking about the meaning and importance of the new material and connecting it to their prior knowledge, beliefs, and mental models (Ambrose et al., 2010; Bransford et al., 1999; Tigner, 1999; Zull, 2002).
8. Students learn new material most easily when the instruction is designed to minimize cognitive load (Feldon, 2010; Sweller, van Merriënboer, & Paas, 1998; Wickens, 2002, 2008; Winne & Nesbit, 2010). By cognitive load, we mean the demands placed on working memory. The mind has a limited capacity to hold information in working memory, so it is important to package information for the most efficient processing possible. This principle is very general but has subprinciples that will clarify its meaning (see the next section).
9. Students learn new material better and can remember it longer when they receive it multiple times and in different ways-that is, through multiple senses and in multiple modes that use different parts of their brain-than when they receive it just once or multiple times in the same way (Doyle & Zakrajsek, 2018; Hattie, 2017; Kress, Jewitt, Ogborn, & Charalampos, 2006; Shams & Seitz, 2008; Tulving, 1967, 1985; Vekiri, 2002; Winne & Nesbit, 2010; Zull, 2002, 2011). Learning styles seem not to exist. Numerous studies have found that teaching to a person's style fails to improve his or her learning over teaching to other styles (Howard-Jones, 2014; Pashler, McDaniel, Rohrer, & Bjork, 2008).
10. Students learn new material better and can remember it longer when they receive it in an organized structure or when they organize and structure it themselves (if they are ready to do so). In fact, the only way people remember anything long term is in a coherent, logically organized structure based on patterns and relationships among interconnected parts. Without a coherent big picture of prior knowledge in their minds, students cannot comprehend and retain new material (Ambrose et al., 2010; Bransford et al., 1999; Hanson, 2006; Svinicki, 2004; Wieman, 2007). Structures are shown most clearly in graphics, which also serve as retrieval cues.
11. Students learn new material better and can remember it longer when they receive it in connection with easy-to-understand stories and example cases (Bower & Clark, 1969; Graesser, Olde, & Klettke, 2002; Haberlandt& Graesser, 1985).
12. Students learn new material better and can remember it longer when they receive it in connection with a number of examples that vary by content, conditions, discipline, and level of abstraction (Hakel & Halpern, 2005).
13. Students learn new material better and can remember it longer when the material evokes emotional and not just intellectual or physical involvement. This principle mirrors the biological base of learning, which is the close communication between the frontal lobes of the brain and the limbic system. From a biological point of view, learning entails changes in the brain in which new or fragile synapses are formed or strengthened (Eyler, 2018; Leamnson, 1999, 2000; Zull, 2002, 2011).
14. Students learn new material better and can remember it longer when they review or practice new material at multiple, intervallic times than when they review it all at one time (Brown, Roediger, & McDaniel, 2014; Butler, Marsh, Slavinsky, &Baraniuk, 2014; Cepeda, Pashler, Vul, Wixted, & Rohrer, 2006; Dunlosky, Rawson, Marsh, Nathan, & Willingham, 2013; Hattie, 2017; Rohrer &Pashler, 2010; Winne & Nesbit, 2010). This schedule of practice is called "spaced" or "distributive," and it can take the form of being tested or self-testing (see item 17 in this list).
15. Students learn new material better and can remember it longer when that review or practice is "interleaved" than when it is "blocked." In other words, students benefit when they occasionally review earlier material as they are learning new material (Butler et al., 2014; Dunlosky et al., 2013; Rohrer &Pashler, 2010).
16. Students learn new material better and can remember it longer when they actively and effectively plan, monitor, and evaluate their learning (self-regulated learning). This means observing their cognitive learning strategies (metacognition), emotional reactions to the material, and physical reactions to their learning environment (Ambrose et al., 2010; Bransford et al., 1999; Hattie, 2017; Nilson, 2013; Winne & Nesbit, 2010; Zimmerman, Moylan, Hudesman, White, &Flugman, 2011).
17. Students learn new material better and can remember it longer when they are tested or test themselves on it than they do when they just reread it (even multiple times), as the former involves retrieval practice and more effortful cognitive processing (see item 14) (Brown et al., 2014; Dempster, 1996, 1997; Dunlosky et al., 2013; Karpicke & Blunt, 2011; McDaniel, Howard, & Einstein, 2009; Roediger & Karpicke, 2006; Rohrer &Pashler, 2010; Rohrer, Taylor, & Sholar, 2010; Winne & Nesbit, 2010). This is called the testing effect.
18. Students can remember material longer after repeated testing when they expect a final comprehensive exam. They will keep material more accessible in memory when they expect to have to recall it in the future than when they do not (Khanna, Badura Brack, & Finken, 2013; Szupnar, McDermott, & Roediger, 2007).
19. Students learn new material better and can remember it longer when they have to produce answers and not just recognize correct ones-that is, when they expect to have to free-recall material for short answer or essay questions (Butler & Roediger, 2007; McDaniel, Anderson, Derbish, & Morrisette, 2007; Tulving, 1967). This is called the generation effect.
20. Students learn new material better and can remember it longer when they have to work harder to learn it-that is, when they have to overcome what are called desirable difficulties (Bjork, 1994, 2013; Bjork & Bjork, 2011; Brown et al., 2014; McDaniel & Butler, 2010). These difficulties can help students generate multiple retrieval paths, increase time on task, and stretch their abilities.
21. Students learn new material better when it creates impasses in their current mental models-that is, contradictions, conflicts, anomalies, uncertainties, and ambiguities, which stimulate curiosity, inquiry, questioning, problem solving, and deep reasoning to restore "cognitive equilibrium" (Chinn & Brewer, 1993; Graesser & McMahen, 1993; Graesser, Lu, Olde, Cooper-Pye, & Whitten, 2005; Graesser & Olde, 2003).
22. Students understand new material better when instructors train them to ask deep thinking and explanation questions such as why, how, and what if as opposed to simple recall questions (Craig, Sullins, Witherspoon, & Gholson, 2006; Graesser & Person, 1994; Rosenshine, Meister, & Chapman, 1996).
23. Students learn new material better and can remember it longer when they can correct and learn from errors (Zimmerman et al, 2011). Research on mice has revealed a biological base: when an organism gets an error signal, its brain releases calcium, which enhances the brain's ability to learn and change, that is, its neuroplasticity (Najafi, Giovannucci, Wang, & Medina, 2014).
24. Students learn from their mistakes more effectively when they receive immediate feedback on an assignment, quiz, or test (Anderson, Corbett, Koedinger, & Pelletier, 1995; McTighe & O'Connor, 2005; Roediger & Marsh, 2005; Shute, 2006).
25. Students learn new material better and can remember it longer when they read it from printed text than from e-textbooks and websites (Baron, 2015; Daniel & Willingham, 2012; Daniel & Woody, 2013; Kolowich, 2014; Mangen, Walgermo, &Brønnick, 2012; Sanchez & Wiley, 2009; Tanner, 2014; Wästlund, Reinikka, Norlander, & Archer, 2005; Zhang, Yan, Kendrick, & Li, 2012).