Problem: For your replies to peers: Compare how different factors (alcohol, social context, gender expectations, miscommunication) shaped each person's interpretation of the situation. mine is 1. The two factors I chose are alcohol and familiarity. Both students had been drinking, which impairs judgment and reduces the ability to clearly assess situations. Alcohol blurs the boundaries of consent, making it difficult for people to recognize when a situation could be dangerous. In this case, Riley might have felt more relaxed and less inclined to set boundaries, as this complicated his ability to recognize the implications of Jordan's actions. Jordan and Riley were familiar with each other, which created a sense of security and trust. When people know each other well, they tend to overlook certain signs that might indicate the need for caution. Riley might have assumed that Jordan's friendliness was an innocent intention rather than an opening for unwanted advances, which led to confusion as the situation unfolded. 2. Jordan exhibited a cognitive distortion known as "misreading signals." This involves interpreting Riley's friendliness as an invitation to sexual contact, rather than recognizing clear consent. Jordan's thinking may have been influenced by the belief that familiarity and prior social interactions implied mutual interest, demonstrating a lack of awareness of the importance of explicit consent before initiating sexual contact. Need Assignment Help?