Problem
Answer one of the following on the appropriate forum of the discussion board in a thread that you create:
How is it possible for two or more lawyers to use the same legal reasoning process, the same set of facts, and the same set of laws, and reach different conclusions? What does this tell us about "the law?" And is that a good thing, a bad thing, or some of both?
Thus far, we have learned about a few different cases: Lopez, Bob Jones University, Brown v. Board of Education, etc. Explain how and why one of them surprised you: the decision reached by the court, the reasoning it uses, or something else.
When you are ready to post to this discussion board, click on the Module Discussion link and Start a New Thread. In the subject field of your initial post and your replies, use a word or phrase that summarizes your posting. Be sure to create and post your initial discussion within the first three days of the module opening. Reply to at least two of your classmates and those who respond to you.