Explain extent to which argument by illusion agree/disagree


Assignment task: Ravi thinks that we perceive sense data. He does not think that material objects exist. Ravi argues that illusory perception and veridical perception are the same thing. Ravi also believes that naive direct realism is a convincing theory. Finally, Ravi thinks that the properties a material object truly has are not necessarily the same as the properties it is perceived to have.

Fully explain the extent to which the argument from illusion would agree or disagree with Ravi's claims.

Fully explain why you agree or disagree that the argument from illusion is a more convincing theory than naive direct realism.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Other Subject: Explain extent to which argument by illusion agree/disagree
Reference No:- TGS03270896

Expected delivery within 24 Hours