Problem: Reword simple Sandoval-Norton and Shkedy argue that long-term ABA may become abusive when it overemphasizes compliance, ignores internal experiences, suppresses autistic behaviors, and creates prompt dependency. They are especially concerned that research does not fully represent nonverbal autistic individuals or individuals with higher support needs. In contrast, Gorycki et al. and Leaf et al. argue that ABA is evidence-based, individualized, data-driven, and intended to increase socially significant skills and independence. Leaf et al. state that ABA-based interventions include many approaches, such as DTT, incidental teaching, PRT, NDBI, BST, FCT, and functional analysis, not just one rigid method. These authors also argue that concerns about abuse should be taken seriously, but not generalized to all ABA without strong evidence. Methodological differences help explain the disagreement because critics often rely on lived experience, surveys, ethical analysis, and concerns about long-term harm, while ABA defenders often rely on single-case designs, outcome studies, and meta-analyses. Both types of evidence are important, but they answer different questions: one looks at measurable skill change, while the other asks whether treatment respects autonomy and emotional well-being. Need Assignment Help?