Question: Reply to this post "Kuhn understands scientific revolutions as a process in which, a newer paradigm replaces a current scientific method or theory. But Kuhn articulates what this is, first, a revolution in this case is just when another theory overthrows an older model, and a crisis is when there are growing suspicion of a current theory. And a crisis can only become a thing when a number of "anomalies" build up enough to produce a crisis, as the result. Now, when a crisis arrives to a specific paradigm, or framework, alternative frameworks come into play to replace the current. Now, when new frameworks arrive, it does not mean that all of them are in accordance with one another. This is due to that new paradigm bringing substantive changes from the current theory, or in new definitions of what things would be, ex: atoms, molecules, particles etc. But when they arrive at one another, they define new bounds, new terms, new methodology on how to conduct the framework, and how the framework relates to that specific field of study. I can't really think of a proper analogy in another field, without thinking of just building on top of the old, without replacing what was laid before." Need Assignment Help?