Problem: Cultural humility and the TIC Model overlap particularly around awareness of power, self-reflection, and practice that is relationship centered. More specifically, they both recognize the imbalances in power, and emphasize the need for ongoing learning and focusing on client's lived experiences. I will embrace practices of cultural humility within my role as a social worker by accepting correction, avoiding assumptions of my clients, and treating them as experts on their own lives. For example, I can approach my clients by asking how their understanding of trauma is influenced by their cultural background, and I can reflect on how my social position may influence my engagement and assessment. 2. The readings have impacted how I see the systems in which our clients function because I have realized that systems like education, healthcare, criminal justice, etc., often cause harm or reinforced trauma. This especially applies to marginalized communities. From a micro perspective, I have a better understanding that client's behaviors are trauma responses and not personal failures. From a macro perspective, the readings highlight the need for policy change and advocacy change. TIC acknowledges that trauma is embedded in social structures and is not just a personal matter. 3. How can social workers simultaneously apply cultural humility and TIC while working in systems that could potentially contribute to retraumatization for clients? In paragraph form respond to Reese' post. Need Assignment Help?