--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Dominant strategies

ACE and BEST are the only two grocery stores into a remote small town within North Dakota. The owners as each other very small, and trust each other even less. When they cooperate the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice will never know. Specified this payoff matrix for ACE and BEST, the dominant strategies: (w) are for neither grocery store to cooperate. (x) are for both stores to cooperate, therefore ensuring that each will make $60,000 annually. (y) will guarantee the greatest total payoff for both stores. (z) should yield similar outcome regardless of how many times these firms play this “game.”

2310_Prisoners Dilemma1.png

I need a good answer on the topic of Economics problems. Please give me your suggestion for the same by using above options.

   Related Questions in Game Theory

  • Q : Tit-for-Tat in Dynamic Games Assume

    Assume that Kevin and Margeaux play a repeated game in that they can choose to act either cooperatively or non cooperatively. When on the third round, Kevin reacts cooperatively and Margeaux react uncooperatively: (1) and both use tit-for-tat strategy

    		•
  • Q : Restriction for illustration of

    Illustration of negative sum games would not comprise: (i) violent carjackings. (ii) “winner-take-all” poker games. (iii) war. (iv) retaliatory barriers to international trade. (v) family feuds. Hey fri

    		•
  • Q : Problem on Negative Sum Games The

    The bloody American Civil War [from 1861 to 1865] is an illustration of a/an: (1) essential evil. (2) moral hazard. (3) predatory game. (4) involuntary intergenerational transfer. (5) negative sum game. I need a good answer on the

    		•
  • Q : Illustration of Second Mover Strategy

    When bartering over a rug in Morocco, Dee rejects to say how much she is willing to pay. In its place she waits for the rug dealer to state a price from that she can bargain. So Dee is using a: (1) first mover strategy. (2) second mover strategy. (3)

    		•
  • Q : Illustration of Nash equilibrium As per

    As per this payoff matrix in demonstrated figure, Alyssa going to the football game when Ben attended the play cannot be Nash equilibrium since: (w) they’d each gain the most possible when Ben watched football when Alyssa went to the play. (x) b

    		•
  • Q : Gain by implementing a first decision A

    A firm which can gain by implementing a first decision before any other firms act has a: (w) predatory pricing strategy. (x) controlling market share. (y) first mover advantage. (z) dominance strategy. Hey friends please give your

    		•
  • Q : Mugging is example of which problem A

    A mugging is an illustration of a: (1) positive-sum game. (2) negative-sum game. (3) zero-sum game. (4) predatory voluntary transfer payment. (5) tit-for-tat game. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend so

    		•
  • Q : Strategies of companies in go to

    In this payoff matrix for the location strategies of companies, when BEST locates first: (w) both companies will go to location 1. (x) both companies will go to location 2. (y) this will go to location 1 and ACE will go to location 2. (z) this will go to location 2 an

    		•
  • Q : Exemplify Zero-Sum Game Making a bet

    Making a bet within an office pool on this year's Super Bowl is an illustration of a: (w) positive-sum game. (x) negative-sum game. (y) zero-sum game. (z) communal sacrifice. I need a good answer on the topic of Economics <

    		•
  • Q : According to game theory in Nash

    According to game theory, when there are multiple Nash equilibria for a repeated game in that case: (w) once one Nash is selected this will be maintained, and all else constant. (x) any Nash equilibrium may be chosen as the first equi

    		•