Nomenclature and Coordination number of complexes Introduction
Nomenclature in coordination chemistry has undergone several modifications. While several of the old and trivial names are still in use for some complexes, International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) provides the modern and most acceptable system of naming complexes. The IUPAC naming system put into consideration the nature of the complex whether cationic or anionic, the number and nature of the ligands in addition to the bonding mode (bridging and non-bridging mode) accepted via the ligand. It is worthy to note that isomeric complexes can as well be identified from their nomenclature. The IUPAC naming system has many features that build it unique and extensively acceptable.
IUPAC system of naming metal complexes
Many coordination compounds have very compound structures due to the nature of their ligands. This might provide increase to their name being long and complicated. Through IUPAC system of naming, the complication in naming isn't eliminated but the naming procedure is organized in a way that it can be simply comprehended via anybody who understands the rules behind it. Rules for Naming Complexes
The subsequent rules must be examined in naming complexes:
Rule 1: For negative complex the positive counter ion (cation) is named first if present, followed via the complex. This is the common way of naming simple salts as well for instance NaCl Sodium Chloride. For positive complex, the complex is named 1st before naming the negative counter ion (anion)
K2[Ni(CN)4] Potassium tetracyanonickelate(II)
[Co(NH3)6]Cl3 Hexamminecobalt (III) chloride
Rule 2: In the coordination sphere, the ligands are named before the metal in alphabetical order of the ligands' names, however the metal ion is written 1st in formula. The coordination sphere is enclosed in square brackets in the formula.
[Cu(NH3)4(H2O)2]SO4 Tetraamminediaquacopper (II) sulphate
[Co(NH3)5Cl]Cl2 Pentaamminechlorocobalt (III) chloride
Rule 3: The number of ligands in a complex is specified via one or both of the prefixes listed below. If the name of the ligand encloses the 1st prefix or is complicated, it is enclosed in parenthesis and the 2nd set of prefix is used. Instances below will illustrate how such prefixes are utilized.
[Co(H2NCH2CH2NH2)2Cl2]Cl Dichlorobis (ethylenediammine) cobalt (III) chloride
[Fe(NH4C5-C5H4N)3]Cl2 tris (bipyridine)iron(III) chloride
Rule 4: Anionic ligands for instance Br-, Cl-, F-, SO42- etc are named with a suffix "o" while neutral ligands retained their usual name except H2O called aqua, NH3 called ammine. Note also that the name of the metal in an anionic complex ends with a suffix "ate"
Ligand Name Metal Name in anionic compex
Br- (Bromide) Bromo Copper Cuprate
SO42-(Sulphate) Sulphato Iron Ferrate
C2O42- (Oxalate) Oxalato Nickel Nickelate
CN- (Cyanide) Cyano Platinum Platinate
-SCN- (Thiocyanate) Thiocyanato-S Titanium Titanate
-SCN-(Isothiocyanate) Thiocyanato-N Gold Aurate
K4[Fe(SCN)6] Potassium hexathiocyanatoferrate(II)
K[Au(CN)2] Potassium dicyanoaurate(i)
Rule 5: For complexes through geometric isomers these isomers are specified using prefix 'cis' and "trans". For instance [PtCl2(NH3)2]
Fig: geometric isomers
Rule 6: A bridging ligand (a ligand joining two or more metal centers) is specified through a prefix "μ" and a subscript to demonstrate the number of the metal centers bridged via the ligand. Instances
Fig: bridging ligand
Coordination number of metal complexes
The coordination number of a metal ion in a compound is the number of ligand donor atoms to that the metal is straightly linked. It is determined by counting the number of the donor atoms or site directly connected to the metal. Coordination number varies from 1 to 8, though the two extremes are rare. The structure of a ligand strongly depends on the coordination number as it determines the number of spatial orientation possible in any specified complex. The diverse coordination numbers will be considered and the possible structures discussed.
Coordination Number1: complexes having coordination number one are rare and little is known of their chemistry. Coordination Number 2: The complex with coordination number 2 well established are silver complexes for instance [Ag(NH3)2]+ where the electronic configuration of Ag+ is d10. The hybridization of Ag+ is sp through bond angle 1800and the possible shape is linear structure. Other examples are [Hg(CN)2], [Au(CN)2] etc.
[H3N→Ag←NH3]+. The arrows point from the donors to the acceptor.
Coordination Number 3: Complexes through coordination number 3 are few. Metals by d10 configuration are generally found through this coordination number. The hybridization is sp2 bond angle 1200, which provides increase to trigonal planar structure. [HgI3]-, [AuCl(PPh3)2], [Au(PPh3)3]+ and so on. Coordination number three is favored via bulky ligand that can induce stearic hindrance and prevent further coordination.
Coordination Number 4: This is a ordinary coordination system that can provide increase to two different geometries i.e. Tetrahedral and square planar, depending on the orbitals of the central metal that received the donor pairs. Divalent ions such as Zn2+, Cd2+, Hg2+and Cu+ with d10 electronic configuration and zero crystal field stabilization energy will provide rise to tetrahedral complexes by sp3 hybridization with bond angle 1090 examples [CdCl4]2-, [Zn(OH)4]2-and [Hg(Br)4]2-. Likewise, few metals through d0 and d5 are recognized to form tetrahedral complexes MnO4-, MnCl42-, TiCl4. Metals by other d-configurations have extremely bounded number of tetrahedral complexes e.g. [NiCl42-] and [Ni(CO)4]with d8 configuration.
Fig: tetrahedral complexes
Square Planar Complexes are common with metals d8 electronic configuration. Instances are [PtCl2(NH3)2], [Ni(CN)4]2- and PdCl42-. The hybridization in such complexes is dsp2 by bond angle of 900.
Fig: Square Planar Complexes
Coordination number 5: two possible structures through coordination number five are square based pyramidal and trigonal bipyramidal through the metal having sp3d hybridization. In square planar, dx2-y2 orbital in the metal will receive one of the donated pairs while in trigonal bipyramidal, dz2 orbital of the metal will receive one of the contributed pairs. The energy difference between the two configurations is small therefore they are interconvertible. Instances are [Fe(CO)5] and [Cu(bipy)2I]+, [VO(acac)2] and [VO(SCN)4]2-.
Coordination Number 6: This is the most general coordination number through two possible geometries for instance octahedral and trigonal prismatic. Octahedral is the most common with metal center having sp3d2 or d2sp3 hybridization through bond angle 900. Instances [Cu(H2O)6]2+, [Co(en)3]3+and [Fe(CN)6]3-.
Fig: octahedral and trigonal prismatic
Higher coordination numbers are possible but not general for instance coordination seven [ZrF7]3- and[HfF7]3-, coordination number eight [ZrF8]4- and [Mo(CN)8]4-.
Tutorsglobe: A way to secure high grade in your curriculum (Online Tutoring)
Expand your confidence, grow study skills and improve your grades.
Since 2009, Tutorsglobe has proactively helped millions of students to get better grades in school, college or university and score well in competitive tests with live, one-on-one online tutoring.
Using an advanced developed tutoring system providing little or no wait time, the students are connected on-demand with an expert at www.tutorsglobe.com. Students work one-on-one, in real-time with a tutor, communicating and studying using a virtual whiteboard technology. Scientific and mathematical notation, symbols, geometric figures, graphing and freehand drawing can be rendered quickly and easily in the advanced whiteboard.
Free to know our price and packages for online chemistry tutoring. Chat with us or submit request at email@example.com
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!