Problem: Rewrite adding an additional few questions of the benefits and risks of addressing transference and countertransference in supervision, and I appreciate how you center validation and safety before offering personal examples. I would add that supervisors can further contain risk by setting a clear supervision contract that outlines when and how disclosure of countertransference is processed, differentiating supervision from personal therapy while still modeling reflective practice. Attending to parallel process can also be useful, as dynamics enacted in the supervisee-supervisor relationship often mirror what unfolds with clients and can illuminate blind spots without overdisclosure. Your discussion of group therapy ethics is strong; two additional areas to emphasize are (1) rigorous pre-group screening and preparation so members understand limits of confidentiality and fit, and (2) concrete procedures for foreseeable risks-mandated reporting, crisis response, and documentation when a breach or harm occurs. In today's settings, it also helps to address telehealth groups, social media boundaries among members, and cultural humility practices (e.g., checking power, identity, and privilege explicitly in the here-and-now). Practically, self-monitoring logs, brief process notes after sessions, and periodic consultation can sustain the ongoing ethical self-assessment you highlight. Overall, your post provides a solid framework that promotes both clinical growth and client protection. Need Assignment Help?