Would court agree that chad has the right to legally evict


Assignment Task:

"Chad Parker owned an acre of property and a mobile home on that property. He sold the mobile home to David and Allison Wilson for $1,000 and sold the property to them for $10,000. These agreements were made orally. No title or deed transfers took place. The Wilsons lived in the mobile home for seven years, making $11,228.19 of improvements to the structure and to the property. After a falling out between Chad and David, Chad had the Wilsons evicted and moved back into the mobile home."

Would a court agree that Chad has the right to legally evict the Wilsons and move back into the mobile home because there was no written contract between the parties?   

In the first paragraph of your post, explain why a court would agree with Chad and allow the Wilsons to be evicted, since there was no written agreement between them.

In the second paragraph of your post, explain why a court would not agree that Chad has the right to evict the Wilsons, even though there was not a written agreement between them.

In your third paragraph, state who you believe should win this case and why. 

Your original (initial) discussion post should be at least 2-3 well-developed paragraphs. Initial discussion posts without supporting information and in-text citations will have points deducted.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Other Subject: Would court agree that chad has the right to legally evict
Reference No:- TGS03371837

Expected delivery within 24 Hours