Problem:
Koehler's approach in his critique is based on questioning where the proof is and careful thinking, which is vital when analyzing statements matters like justifying war. In questioning each of statements made by Former President Bush's, Koehler is not dismissing them but challenging whether they are true or accurate. Crazy part is that this is human nature to question everything and verify if it is true. This method supports the fact that readers need to think more deeply about the language used in political speeches let alone life in general and to understand the importance of not accepting information without evidence. President Bush made his case for war in Iraq, by not just being an announcement it was also an attempt to persuade the public. Questioning the reasons behind his speech is key in deciding your position on war. Political leaders often use speeches to explain their actions, change minds, and stir emotions but without solid proof, these claims should be considered empty words. Koehler reveals that anyone can make strong statements, but it's the speaker's job to support those statements with clear, irrefutable proof. In this case, the lack of strong evidence for the claims about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq made many people question whether the reasons for war were weak. Respond to this 150 words informal paragraph. Need Assignment Help?