Problem: Respond to this post, Culture and intercultural competence are defined differently by Hofstede, Deardorff, and Praxmarer, yet their views are strongly interconnected. Hofstede views culture as a collective "mental programming" shared by members of a group that distinguishes them from others. There are important similarities among the three perspectives. All acknowledge that culture significantly shapes perception, behavior, and communication, and all recognize the necessity of cultural awareness in intercultural interactions. Hofstede provides a macro-level framework that helps identify broad cultural patterns, while Deardorff and Praxmarer operate more at the micro-level, focusing on individual learning, communication, and ethical engagement. Hofstede's model can be seen as offering a starting point for cultural understanding, whereas Deardorff's and Praxmarer's models explain how individuals can act competently within and across those cultural patterns. In my opinion, Hofstede's dimensions strongly inspire the development of both Deardorff's and Praxmarer's intercultural competencies, even if indirectly. Hofstede's dimensions help individuals recognize that cultural differences are systematic rather than random, which supports the development of attitudes such as respect and openness emphasized by Deardorff. For example, understanding differences in power distance or individualism can encourage empathy and reduce ethnocentric judgments. in 125 words in a conversational style. Need Assignment Help?