1. What are H.B Fuller's moral obligations in this case? What ideas, effects, and consequence at stake? Have any moral right been violated? What would a utilitarian recommend?
2. What would a Kantian say about this case?
3. When, if ever, is a company morally responsible for harm done by blatant misuse of a perfectly legitimate and socially useful product? Do utilitarians and Kantians disagree on their respective assessment of these cases?
4. Given H.B fuller's conduct in other matters, would you judge it to be a morally responsible company, all things considered? Are companies that pride themselves of being morally responsible likely to be held to a higher standard than other companies? If so, is this fair?