Problem:
Create a reply: When social media was introduced to the internet, it quickly became not only a place for people to share photos of friends and family, but a place for meaningful discourse on policy and global affairs. Social media has been integral to the public's opinion in the 2000's. Now, instead of getting information only from public officials, there is a vast network of information and opinions on the internet that can help civilians form their own opinions. However, public officials have adapted to this and taken to social media themselves. There, they have garnered mass support for their ideas and have been able to reach much more people than ever before. President Trump's victory in the 2016 election is the best example of this. His tweets and use of social media platforms helped him to gain mass support around the country and win an election nobody thought he had a chance of winning. Some disadvantages of these officials using social media to reach the masses would be the emergence of dis and misinformation. It is now easier to spread false information that is harmful to the public and can drastically effect policy. It is up to citizens to discern between what is and is not the truth, they must do their own research and participate in peaceful and civil discussions to get to the truth. The use of social media by officials has also created the idea that there are stark divisions in beliefs in the US, when they are not that different in reality. Polarizing the citizen. Need Assignment Help?