Problem: Supporters of the death penalty argue that it permanently removes dangerous individuals from society, ensuring they can never harm anyone again. This argument is based on the idea of incapacitation, which means preventing future crime by completely restricting an offender's ability to act. While life imprisonment also limits freedom, advocates claim it still carries risks, such as violence against prison staff or other inmates, the possibility of escape (even if rare), or continued influence within criminal networks from inside prison. Some supporters further argue that execution prevents offenders from ever killing again if they are later released due to legal errors, changes in parole laws, or shifts in public policy. From this perspective, proponents believe society has a moral duty to prioritize the protection of innocent lives over the rights of individuals convicted of murder. Summarize the argument below in 2-3 sentences and is it pro or anti death penalty. Need Assignment Help?