Can you please please discuss first then do the first one I already give it to you later.
Can you discuss on First Meditation:
On what can be called into doubt ( maybe question number 1 or 3 is good for you because nuber 2 is the book
Choose one of the following sets of questions and provide a thoughtful response to all of the sub-questions.
1) What is problematic about trying to prove that what you experience is actually out in the world? What can we conclude about the fact that we only have direct access to our own minds? Does this rule out the possibility of things existing outside of your mind? Why can't science help us resolve this problem?
2) According to Nagel, why do some argue that radical skepticism is meaningless? How could we determine whether it is true that the external world doesn't exist? Why might skeptics not be persuaded by these types of arguments?
3) What does it mean to use a "method of doubt"? What types of experiences does Descartes call into doubt? What is "radical doubt"? What are some of the scenarios Descartes uses to represent this more radical form of doubt? How is it different from the doubts we experience in our everyday lives?