Sunkist Growers Inc. brought Nabisco to court, claim- ing that under the companies' mutually agreed-on license agreement, Nabisco was causing Sunkist to engage in improper practices. Nabisco claimed that, under the license agreement, the companies had to settle the dispute through arbitration. However, Sun- kist claimed that it was a nonsignatory to the contract and thus did not have to settle through arbitration. Nabisco claimed that Sunkist was legally compelled to settle through arbitration, even though Sunkist had not signed the document, because the two parties admitted to the license agreement being an agree- ment between them and both companies' actions had been based on the agreement. How do you think the court decided? [10 F. 3d 753 (Ga. CA 11, 1993).]