Question: The question asked is more of an ethical one rather than a factual one, and it can vary depending on personal beliefs and legal interpretations. However, I can provide a general perspective based on employment law and contract principles. If TIP Tech digs deep into Amira's personnel file to find a reason to fire her with cause, it could be seen as unethical, especially if the reason is minor or irrelevant to her current performance. However, whether it's legally acceptable or not would depend on the specific terms of the contract and employment laws in the jurisdiction where this is happening. As for the requirement for Amira to mitigate her damages, this is a common principle in contract law. The idea is to prevent a party from profiting from a breach of contract and to encourage them to minimize their losses. It might seem unfair to Amira, but from a legal perspective, it's generally seen as a reasonable expectation. Remember, this is a general perspective and the specifics can vary greatly depending on the exact circumstances, the terms of the contract, and the laws of the jurisdiction. Why?