Problem:
This week's content is really interesting to me, particularly in regards to terminology. I had heard "dual relationships" previously, but boundaries around "multiple relationships" is new to me. When thinking about the power of words, and being choiceful, I prefer the term multiple relationships. I think it does a better job of honoring instances of unavoidable overlap, where counselors and individuals have more than one context of familiarity, but maintain appropriate and professionally separate boundaries in each. Specifically reflecting on examples offered regarding small time living, it really highlights the importance of acknowledging the unavoidable and gives a framework from which to ethically approach relationships with clients outside of the session. (For example, if I have a client that incidentally becomes my child's high school football coach, the onus would be on me to 1. Have this conversation about boundaries and professional obligations with my clients, and 2. To maintain the differentiation.)
Further reflection on this topic brings me to the video of the week. What struck me most in the video with Dr. Robey was the role play of her advising her supervisee. Truthfully, my gut reaction to sexual advances from a client that were unrelenting or so direct would have been to terminate, or to transfer to another counselor. Hearing it talked through from both sides in the role play gave me a lot more insight. Expanding my perspective, particularly in consideration of what the client may be trying to fulfill in seeking more from the relationship made me realize that it actually may be such a useful juncture in the therapeutic relationship if handled appropriately. The main message I think is that each situation is different, each client and relationship is different, and at the end of the day it is so important to seek advice whenever entering gray area. Need Assignment Help?
My question is to reply to a post to the student