Assignment:
Short reaction papers that use the material you are reading and discussions in class are a great way to accomplish that. You can integrate the readings with (a) class discussions, (b) something you read in the news, (c) something you are learning in another course, or (d) something that actually happened to you in the reaction papers. Each paper should have at least 3 journal sources. An empirical study can be created to test a hypothesis. You may look up Alabama laws and report on what you find. You can present two arguments on different sides of an issue. Critical thinking must be clearly through your presentation of the dilemma and your argument. Each reaction paper should be between 750-1000 words, double-spaced, and typed in a 12-point Times New Roman font using APA formatting.
TOPIC:
A. Student Disclosure of Personal Information-Considering the ethical guidelines outlined for psychologists and students in training (section 7.04- Student disclosure of personal information), how can psychology programs strike the right balance between respecting students' privacy and autonomy while also ensuring that personal disclosure is appropriately required when it is deemed necessary for the well-being of the students and those they may interact with professionally? What practical steps can programs take to implement these guidelines effectively, creating a supportive and ethical learning environment? Need Assignment Help?
Section 7.04 -STUDENT DISCLOSURE OF PERSONAL INFORMATION
Psychologists do not require students or supervisees to disclose personal information in course- or program-related activities, either orally or in writing, regarding sexual history, history of abuse and neglect, psychological treatment, and relationships with parents, peers, and spouses or significant others except if (1) the program or training facility has clearly identified this requirement in its admissions and program materials or (2) the information is necessary to evaluate or obtain assistance for students whose personal problems could reasonably be judged to be preventing them from performing their training- or professionally related activities in a competent manner or posing a threat to the students or others.