Problem:
Write a 300-word minimum response with an apa 7 citation from or effects evaluations indicate that a program has yielded quantifiable changes in desired outcomes, e.g., lower recidivism, fewer convictions, or better indicators of public safety. Such assessments most usually take a quantitative design in either a quasi-experimental or comparison group to determine the causal relationships between program participation and outcomes (Yukhnenko et al., 2023). The promotion of a prosecutor-led gun diversion program is also an example of peer-reviewed research that compared the recidivism of participants with a matched comparison group over two years. Findings indicated that the odds of violent and weapons-related convictions were lower among the program graduates compared to the non-participants, which provided proof of the program impacting criminal justice outcomes (Epperson et al., 2024). Outcome evaluations give answers about whether or not a program works to make policy, funding, and implementation decisions. The primary distinction between such assessments is their priorities: process assessment describes how a program is carried out and what strengths and challenges implementation has, whereas outcome assessment views how successful a program is in achieving the desired outcomes and empirically tests the latter (Piper et al., 2024; Epperson et al., 2024). The combination of them provides an in-depth view of program performance and worth in a criminological field. Need Assignment Help?