There was an interesting article about the Constitution and its importance in the July 4, 2011 issue of Time magazine titled "Does it still Matter?" One of the issues in the article discussed how the Constitution is to be interpreted. One school of thought says that we should always interpret the Constitution under the circumstances of its origin (Justice Scalia who recently passed away was an originalist). Another school of thought views it as a living and transformative document that should be interpreted based on the current times. Where do you stand? Explain substantively. This was a huge issue in the recent confirmation of Justice Neil Gorsuch. The same interpretive logic has and will come into play as the courts continue to wrestle with the meaning of the word "sex" under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.