Nash equilibrium for one-shot simultaneous-move game


Problem 1: As part of a fractious breakup, Dana and Blair have recently sold their joint possession, an electric keyboard, for $200. They now are arguing about how to split the proceeds of the sale. In order to reach a conclusion, they have enlisted the services of Mordecai the Mediator. Mordecai proposed the following solution: "I want eash of you, seperately and independently, to write on a slip of paper the number of dollars that you would like to keep for yourself (XD and XB). If XD + XB is less than or equal to $200, then you can each keep the figure you name and I'll take the rest [ie. $200 - XD + XB] as my mediation fee. If XD + XB > $200, then I will keep the entire $200."

a) Identify the Nash equilibrium (or equilibria) for this one-shot simultaneous-move game. Explain your reasoning.

b) What do you think would be the most likely outcome of this game? Briefly explain.

Problem 2: Firms I and II are duopoly producers of differentiated products. In each period, the profits for each firm depend on the pricing decisions of both, as given in the following table.

106_Pricing decison.jpg

a) Identify the one-shot, simultaneous-move pure-strategy Nash equilibrium or equilibria for this game.

b) Assume that each firm [i=I,II] maximizes the geometrically-discounted present value of the infinite sum of its expected current and future payoffs. Assume also that both firms follow strategies incorporating a "tough trigger" enforcement mechanism, defined by "Charge the 'High' price as long as both firms charged a 'High' price in the previous period; otherwise charge the 'Low' price forever after." For what values will these strategies specify a repeated-game Nash equilibrium?

c) Repeat your results from part c) if the firms instead adopt strategies incorporating a "mild trigger" enforcement mechanis, defined by "Charge the 'High' price as long as both firms charged a 'High' price in the previous period; otherwise charge a 'Medium' price forever after." Is it more likely that Firm I and Firm II will be able to sustain cooperation with this more lenient enforcement strategy? Briefly explain.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Managerial Economics: Nash equilibrium for one-shot simultaneous-move game
Reference No:- TGS01751654

Now Priced at $25 (50% Discount)

Recommended (92%)

Rated (4.4/5)