Modelling and analysis of a conceptual trigeneration energy


Topic - Modelling and Analysis of a Conceptual Trigeneration Energy System

Literature review on this topic all the contents are attached in file.

Literature review content to be covered for almost 10 pages.

Typical content of Literature Review submission (Followings are the major ones but not limited within these):

1. Title page (we discussed it earlier)

2. Introduction

Brief what about the research, what are available, what is the context of research, background and significances/importance, what is the gap/research question, how your research will fill that gap, etc.... end up with a short conclusion for the chapter.

(Then you will be able to state the objectives of your research)

3. Objectives

Clearly in simple words understandable for general mass of population / in one or two sentences...

4. Keywords / just only wording - no more than five (5) that identifies your research amongst others within database.

5. Benefits and Stakeholders

Progressing science and technology, any industry, partners/stakeholders/patrons

6. Literature Review
What people have done in this area of research (theory, formula, hypothesis, techniques, methodology, etc....), describe in brief and draw comments, how these are good or bad, enhance your knowledge out of their contributions, adopt their knowledge for enhancing yours, narrate their contributions with references,......... correlate your works making differences (positive/negative...)

7. Conclusion
State your conclusion of your own contribution, what is the contribution in scientific sense, ... contributions may be numbered or stated in stanzas.

8. List of References / Follow Harvard or Vancouver Technique
(Harvard: Last name/s of authours/s, year published...there will be a lecture session on Referencing in Week 6).

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Mechanical Engineering: Modelling and analysis of a conceptual trigeneration energy
Reference No:- TGS02884446

Now Priced at $100 (50% Discount)

Recommended (94%)

Rated (4.6/5)