1) As part of plan to market a new line of investment securities, Merchant's Bank assigned Mike to study the accounts of some of its major depositors. Mike performed a computer analysis to determine at that times of the year the accounts of the depositors reflected the most activity. Mike had been reading in the newspaper about a series of unsolved bank robberies in the area. In examining the reports, Mike noticed that Dustiin had made a substantial deposit on the day following each of the unsolved robberies. Mike phoned the police to report his discovery. After the conversation, two police officers went to Merchant to examine with Mike the records of Dustin's account. The police then investigated Dustin's activities on the days of the robberies and eventually obtained more evidence that dustin was involved in the robberies. Dustin was arrested and prosecuted for the bank robberies. Should Dustin's motion to suppress the evidence of his involvement in the robberies be granted?
2) Jordan, a private citizen, suspects Amos of purloining his tools. While Amos is not home, Jordan breaks into Amos' locked garage and finds a stash of illegal drugs (cocaine from Miami), but no tools. Jordan turns the drugs over to law enforcement, who arrested Amos on a drug charge. Will Amos succeed a motion to suppress the drugs?