Problem:
Remember all participation replies each topic week should be substantive with 250 words. If citing a source please demonstrate APA 7th edition.
A well comprised problem space is identified by one' ability to further investigate what is known within the current research, what has been disputed, and what is not known about the current research. Utilizing a more structured strategic approach to reading the literature assists with understanding and identify key areas to identifying the gaps, within the literature. Farooq (2017) also suggests "back referencing" to gather additional information about the cultivation of understanding of past studies. While exploring the literature, critical analysis is necessary when reading the empirical articles to identify questionable areas within the current research findings (Creswell, 2023; Farooq, 2017). When the findings cannot thoroughly address or answer the research question, there may be a gap in the research.
This can be established by identifying inconsistencies within the methodology of past studies, areas of limitations, and suggested further research within the conclusion of the article. Upon finding the gap in the study, the problem space can then be justified by challenging the inconsistencies and exploring the now problematic area; justification within the problem space should validate the current need for the study while explaining how one plans to address the problem; while considering context, expected outcomes, theoretical frameworks, and feasibility of the study; which creates a new blueprint that offers one's opportunity to build upon existing research (Farooq, 2017). Need Assignment Help?
References:
Creswell, J. a. C. J. D. (2023). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Sixth ed.). Sage Publishing.
Farooq, R. (2017). A framework for identifying research gap in social sciences: Evidence from the past. IUP Journal of Management Research, 16(4), 66-75.