Assignment:
Must be APA format, answer posts thoroughly, must have at least one verifiable, legitimate reference if needed no less than 150 words.
Discussion 1
I think that in a perfect world, there would be a distinct balance in regards to security vs. privacy. Realistically, it seems that that balance ratio may not be achievable due to the ever lingering threats that could stand to pose harm to the public. I personally believe that the use of bio-metric technology is well suited as a separate layer of physical security that, when properly deployed, can be extremely effective at keeping personal things such as personal information secure. The ironic fact is that while it can be used to protect our personal information there is a real concern that it could actually be used to gain access to personal information. In the wrong hands, the use of bio-metrics can be detrimental to those who use it to protect valuable information or to keep potential plans confidential.
One of the main concerns I have in regards to the three categories is function creep. While this may be nothing more than a personal worry, it is not hard to let the mind drift off to the possibility that any personal information may be used for information other than what is stated at the time of collection. "When biometrics is instead used to offer an identity to individuals solely for the purpose of categorization, we can then consider this to be an unwelcome risk of this technology." (Mordini, 2009) Issues such as categorization as mentioned above could be an alarming threat, however there seems to be very little evidence to suggest that this is an actual occurring practice. I think that ethically there is very little concern other than what the potential could be if these programs or technology fell into the wrong hands of those who intend to use them for malicious purposes.
References:
Mordini, E., & Green, M. (2009). Identity, security and democracy: the wider social and ethical implications of automated systems for human identification. Amsterdam: Ios Press.
Response 1
Discussion 2
Subscribe
I feel that there is a valuable use for biometrics in the safety of the Nation. But, the use must be regulated and guarded. I have been fingerprinted several times throughout my life and have also had my DNA taken. I exist in several databases and have had that information breached. But still, my stance is the benefits outweigh the possible draw backs. I have identity theft monitoring for the possibility that the data breach compromised my SSN. And by having my DNA on file I can be cleared of any false accusations. I am not so naive as to think that this information could not be used by criminals or enemies for nefarious purposes. But, I have faith in our system and ultimately those individuals would be discovered and defeated. I can accept fingerprinting, DNA acquisition and retinal scans to access secured areas. But I do not think data mining of my electronic and online footprint is as acceptable. There should be limits on the use of that information. Stopping terrorist plots and criminal behavior is perfectly acceptable. Selling the fact that I looked for a couch is not acceptable. I should not log off my computer after just looking up a price for widget A and turn on my phone to see ads for the same widget.
Response 2
Where the last two discussions below formed there opinion.
Will bring us in contact with cultural relativism at the local level. You may not initially see the connection but as we move through this discussion, I will post my comments and I am confident that you will see cultural relativism at work. Mayor Keegan served the city that I worked for. This scenario impacted me in a couple of profound ways. I will share those impacts as we move through the discussion.
Instructions:
1) Put on the hat of the City Manager and or City Council Members
2) Has a breach of ethics occurred in this situation?
3) If so, what was the breach? If not, why not?
4) In your capacity of City Manager/City Council Member, what actions would you recommend?
5) Take off the official hat and tell us your personal reaction.
Attachment:- Case Study.rar