Problem: Make sure to explain the website's rhetorical situation and provide a brief summary of the website's content. Then, craft a three-level thesis statement. Try using the following questions to help you develop a working thesis statement. Conclusion: How would you evaluate the source's credibility and classify it using to Zimdars' list? (Don't reference Zimdar specifically; just explain what is "wrong" with the website.) Premises: What is problematic about the source's rhetoric (ethos, logos, pathos)? Significance: Why is this article-and articles like it with the same classification-important and/or relevant to you, your audience, and/or our world in general? What makes them persuasive? Your introduction should be approximately 3/4 of a page. Reference is the article of "As a Scientist & Mother I'm Against Vaccines & This Is What I Want You to Know" by Cafemom