Problem
Answer only this question: Analyze the case to determine whether each required element or requirement is present regarding each legal issue raised by the case.
(Need explanation in detail from Canadian Business and the Law Seventh Edition from Dorothy Du Plessis)
Edie, Alma, and Tim established a restaurant called EATs. Edie, a retired teacher, invested $20,000 in the venture, and Alma and Tim each invested $10,000. Edie, Alma, and Tim do not have a formal agreement concerning the allocation of responsibilities, but they each take turns doing the cooking. The serving and clean-up tasks are done by staff. One day, while Edie was doing the cooking, Juan got food poisoning from his meal. Juan intends to sue EATs, Edie, Alma, and Tim for damages of $100,000. If Juan is successful, how will the damages be allocated among the parties? If the restaurant were incorporated under EATs Inc. and Edie owned 50% of the shares, Alma owned 25%, and Tim owned 25%, how would he damages be allocated? What do these two situations illustrate about risk?