Discuss the below:
At the beginning of the tort power point, I presented a scenario concerning a woman who may or may not have been rendered unable to have children because of some medication she was prescribed. If the woman sues the manufacturer, she only needs to prove that the product caused her infertility; she does not have to prove fault. For this discussion provide ONE reason why you think it benefits society that we do not require fault on the part of the Defendant for the Plaintiff to succeed on a Product Liability Claim; AND provide ONE reason this no-fault issue harms society. Do not comment on whether the woman would win or not; rather, keep your discussion comments direct at the policy reasons for Product Liability.