Discuss the following:
Case study that intentionally does not give you enough detail for you to quickly resolve the issue. This is meant to enable you to use the processes of critical thinking to reach conclusions. Given the gaps in information provided to you, you will identify what you know, what you don’t know, and what questions you need to ask as you start your investigation of the facts of the case. The process is designed to encourage clear thinking and to help you to identify potential cognitive traps that could derail well-reasoned conclusions.
Step 1: Prepare to Think Critically
Prepare to respond to your boss’s request for an analysis of a problem in your organization. You realize that this will require careful thinking. So, you take some time to review the process and to engage in Critical Thinking and Analysis.
When you have completed the critical thinking exercises, you will move on to the next step: identifying the problem.
Step 2: Identify the Problem
Now that you have reviewed the process, apply that to the problem by reviewing the case, "Trouble in the Truss Construction Shop." Your first task is to figure out how the incident resulted in a problem in the truss construction shop.
Remember the direction from your boss is to “apply your critical thinking and analytical skills to figure out what happened, what we know and don’t know, and how the organization might remedy this situation.”
So, what is the problem that resulted from the incident, and why might there be different interpretations of the facts?
Outline the points that you want to make in the first two sections of your paper (introduction, explanation), and draft those sections.
Next, you will analyze the information.
Step 3: Analyze the Information
Once that you have some understanding of the issues of the event, gather and analyze information. The Problem Analysisresources will further aid your analysis and development of the third section of your paper.
Outline the points that you want to make in Section 3: Analysis of the Information of your paper, and draft that section.
Step 4: Consider and Analyze Other Viewpoints, Conclusions, and Solutions
Once you have completed your analysis of the incident, the next step is to analyze alternative viewpoints, conclusions, and solutions. To do this you will need to apply Ethical Decision-Making and Reasoning. Also highly recommended, Randolph Pherson's "The Five Habits of the Master Thinker," a paper written for intelligence analysts, but applicable to all analytical thinking and reasoning.
Outline the points that you want to make in Section 4: Analysis of Alternative Viewpoints, Conclusions, or Solutions of your paper, and draft that section.
Step 5: Develop Well-Reasoned Conclusions
You considered alternative viewpoints in the last step. Now you’re ready to develop your personal conclusions and suggest remedies so that your boss is well-equipped to brief her leadership about the situation.
Remember, you will need to consult outside references (at least one reputable outside resource) related to the topic to support your conclusions and proposed decisions.
Now, outline your argument and draft the final sections. You are preparing a paper for your boss, and you will submit it in the final step.
Review the format requirements to be sure the paper is complete, and then submit your Short Analysis Paper.
Format Requirements
You will write a short paper (no more than 1,500 words, excluding the cover page and references, as necessary) that analyzes the claims in the case and provides suggestions for remedying the situation.
Structure your paper with these major headings:
1. Introduction
2. Explanation of the Issue
3. Analysis of the Information
4. Analysis of Alternative Viewpoints, Conclusions, or Solutions
5. Personal Conclusion and Suggestions for Remedying the Situation
6. Conclusion
Follow these guidelines:
? Cite at least one reputable outside resource related to the topic to support your conclusion or proposed remedy.
? Employ APA style for format and citation guidance.
? Include a cover sheet with your name, course section, date, and the Turnitin.com originality score. Best Practices for a Paper
• An effective introduction grabs the reader’s attention and sets the tone and direction for the rest of the paper. The introduction should give the reader a clear idea of what will follow. Supporting paragraphs move the reader from the general introduction to the more specific aspects of your analysis.
• The body paragraphs show how the information you are providing supports and relates to your thinking. Even though you've provided the title for each section, paragraphs across and within sections need to effectively transition from one to the next.
• Each paragraph must include a topic sentence, which contains the main point of the paragraph.
• The conclusion brings to a close what you have presented in your paper