Both Shue, in 'Torture', and Hill, in 'Ticking Bombs, Torutre, and the Analogy with Self-Defense' discuss situations under which torture may be morally justified, at least theoretically. please briefly spell out the conditions under which each may grant the moral permissibility of torture. Then, briefly give a criticism of one or both of those theoretical justifications of torture. Do you think they're right? Why or why not? The criticism need not be negative; if you agree, try to add something meaningful to their justification that is not present, or which they may not have previously considered.