--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Tit-for-tat behavior for games strategies

John and Amy have agreed to divide any fudge left over after today. Every time Amy eats a piece of fudge today and also John does, vice versa as well. Their tactics are termed as: (1) grim strategy. (2) tit-for-tat behavior. (3) copy-cat behavior. (4) echoing tactics. (5) second mover advantages.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Game Theory

  • Q : Game Theory and Oligopoly Economists

    Economists would be probably to apply game theory to the market structure of: (1) oligopoly. (2) perfect competition. (3) pure monopoly. (4) labor unions. (5) monopolistic competition. Please choos

    		•
  • Q : Grim Strategy in Nash Equilibrium A

    A strategy combination where every player is playing a best response to other players' current strategies, and therefore has no incentive to change strategies in a repeating game is termed as: (1) zero-sum equilibrium. (2) the first mover advantage. (3) tit-for-tat. (

    		•
  • Q : NO net incentives to change current

    Rivals with no net incentives to modify their current strategies within a repeating sequence of games have arrived at a location of: (1) Nash equilibrium. (2) static churn. (3) classical steady state. (4) the invisible hand. (5) tactical impasse.

    		•
  • Q : Prisoner's dilemma game theory This

    This payoff matrix as in demonstrated figure for two countries that belong to the OPEC cartel exemplifies: (w) a prisoner's dilemma game. (x) a game in which neither participant has a dominant strategy. (y) why neither country will cheat as a dominant

    		•
  • Q : Problem about Second Mover Strategy A

    A second-mover strategy is probable to be most advantageous for: (1) an operatic tenor being interviewed as a potential contestant on “American Idol.” (2) a boxer along with a great knockout punch fighting a slower and weaker opponent. (3)

    		•
  • Q : Game theory according to oligopolists

    The game theory approach supposes that oligopolists: (w) do not maximize profit. (x) act strategically. (y) are actually monopolists in disguise. (z) maximize revenue. I need a good answer on the t

    		•
  • Q : Illustration of Nash equilibrium As per

    As per this payoff matrix in demonstrated figure, Alyssa going to the football game when Ben attended the play cannot be Nash equilibrium since: (w) they’d each gain the most possible when Ben watched football when Alyssa went to the play. (x) b

    		•
  • Q : Different charging in Nash equilibrium

    Red Hat wants to increase the power of Linux to attract Windows users. Microsoft is planning Windows Minus, a weaker version to compete with Linux. Each can sell low, medium, or high powered versions of the new software, but each consequently must charge higher, mediu

    		•
  • Q : According to game theory in Nash

    According to game theory, when there are multiple Nash equilibria for a repeated game in that case: (w) once one Nash is selected this will be maintained, and all else constant. (x) any Nash equilibrium may be chosen as the first equi

    		•
  • Q : Problem regarding Prisoners’ Dilemma

    The District Attorney has Car Jacker and also Cat Burglar nailed for possession of stolen goods after a long crime spree. Now the DA separately gives them the options in this pay-off matrix. Even though these offers operate only once, when Car Jacker and Cat Burglar a

    		•