--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Strategy game theory of Tit for Tat

Garbanzo lowers the price for its salad buffet. Pinto’s, a close by rival restaurant, in that case lowers its price for its salad buffet, a near substitute. If Garbanzo notices it, then the manager lowers the price again. It trend continues. Such restaurants are following a strategy game theorist’s call: (i) Nash equilibrium. (ii) tit-for-tat. (iii) the domino effect. (iv) grim strategy. (v) cut-throat competition.

How can I solve my Economics problem? Please suggest me the correct answer.

   Related Questions in Game Theory

  • Q : Gain by implementing a first decision A

    A firm which can gain by implementing a first decision before any other firms act has a: (w) predatory pricing strategy. (x) controlling market share. (y) first mover advantage. (z) dominance strategy. Hey friends please give your

    		•
  • Q : Infrastructure and decreasing cost

    Assume that government in a developing nation enables start-up some firms to manufacture at lower costs by building infrastructure (for example, power grids and transportation networks), as well as also facilitates learning-by-doing through building p

    		•
  • Q : Competitive prices and efficiency and

    When all industries were purely competitive and externalities were not present and when the distribution of income was viewed as fair by consensus of the population, in that case the marginal value to society of an extra unit of a goo

    		•
  • Q : Mugging is example of which problem A

    A mugging is an illustration of a: (1) positive-sum game. (2) negative-sum game. (3) zero-sum game. (4) predatory voluntary transfer payment. (5) tit-for-tat game. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend so

    		•
  • Q : Exemplify Zero-Sum Game Making a bet

    Making a bet within an office pool on this year's Super Bowl is an illustration of a: (w) positive-sum game. (x) negative-sum game. (y) zero-sum game. (z) communal sacrifice. I need a good answer on the topic of Economics <

    		•
  • Q : Explain Nash equilibrium with an example

    In this payoff matrix as in illustrated, when the husband gets to choose first: (w) he will watch the film and his wife will play golf. (x) he will play golf and his wife will see the film. (y) they will both play golf. (z) they will both see the film.

    Q : NOT including competition in

    Illustrations of cooperative games do not comprise: (1) collective bargaining, in which the firms and unions bargain over employment. (2) international treaties that regulate trade. (3) pure competition. (4) plea bargaining between prosecutors and def

    		•
  • Q : Illustration of Nash equilibrium As per

    As per this payoff matrix in demonstrated figure, Alyssa going to the football game when Ben attended the play cannot be Nash equilibrium since: (w) they’d each gain the most possible when Ben watched football when Alyssa went to the play. (x) b

    		•
  • Q : Application of game theory Within the

    Within the application of game theory, in that case the payoff is: (w) the game’s outcome. (x) the rival firm’s actions. (y) a consequence only of one firm’s actions. (z) is always uncertain. How

    		•
  • Q : Zero Sum Games A “ winner-take-all ”

    A “winner-take-all” game of poker is an illustration of a: (w) positive-sum game. (x) negative-sum game. (y) zero-sum game. (z) non-zero sum game. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given

    		•