--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

NO net incentives to change current strategies of games

Rivals with no net incentives to modify their current strategies within a repeating sequence of games have arrived at a location of: (1) Nash equilibrium. (2) static churn. (3) classical steady state. (4) the invisible hand. (5) tactical impasse.

How can I solve my Economics problem? Please suggest me the correct answer.

   Related Questions in Game Theory

  • Q : Flip-flop Strategy in Game Theory

    Famous categories of strategic games do not comprise: (1) grim strategy. (2) tit-for-tat. (3) cooperative games. (4) flip-flop strategy. (5) first mover strategies. How can I solve my Economics pro

    		•
  • Q : Study of independent decision Game

    Game theory is about the study of: (w) the utility maximizing behavior of individuals. (x) strategic interactions between interdependent decision makers. (y) independent decision making process of an individual firm. (z) the policy making process of a

    		•
  • Q : Example of Nash equilibrium In this

    In this payoff matrix as in demonstrated figure, when the wife gets to choose first: (w) she will watch the film and her husband will play golf. (x) she will play golf and her husband will go to the movies. (y) they will both play golf. (z) they will both go to the th

    		•
  • Q : Tit-for-Tat behavior The tit-for-tat

    The tit-for-tat behavior that frequently emerges in an infinitely repeated game may be summarized as do unto others like: (w) they most recently did unto you. (x) you would have them do unto you. (y) before they do unto you. (z) they have ever done un

    		•
  • Q : Illustration of cooperative game Tom

    Tom and Jill and John are the merely remaining contestants upon the TV show Survivor. Both Tom and Jill secretly collude to divide the million dollars for winning, as well as vote John off the island. Therefore their agreement is an illustration of a: (1) grim strateg

    		•
  • Q : Zero Sum Games A “ winner-take-all ”

    A “winner-take-all” game of poker is an illustration of a: (w) positive-sum game. (x) negative-sum game. (y) zero-sum game. (z) non-zero sum game. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given

    		•
  • Q : Problem about Asymmetric Information A

    A large firm knows own costs and the costs of its rival. However a smaller rival firm knows its own costs although is unaware of costs of larger firm. The larger firm is likely to gain due to: (1) industrial concentration. (2) a dominant strategy. (3) predatory practi

    		•
  • Q : Operates dilemma of prisoner When this

    When this prisoners’ dilemma operates upon a one-time basis, in that case the result is probably to be in the quadrant for: (1) confess; confess. (2) hold out; hold out. (3) Ack-Ack confess; Bongo holdout. (4) Bongo confess; Ack-Ack holdout. (5)

    		•
  • Q : Tit-for-Tat in Dynamic Games Assume

    Assume that Kevin and Margeaux play a repeated game in that they can choose to act either cooperatively or non cooperatively. When on the third round, Kevin reacts cooperatively and Margeaux react uncooperatively: (1) and both use tit-for-tat strategy

    		•
  • Q : Example of a second mover strategy An

    An instance of a second mover strategy would be a: (1) baseball manager waiting till the other team's manager inserts a pinch hitter before selecting a relief pitcher. (2) firm's decision to lay-off workers. (3) union going on strike while a labor con

    		•