--%>

Computers playing games

How Computers playing games can be categorized according to different dimensions?

E

Expert

Verified

Computers playing games:

Competing against each other in the form of a game is nothing new. Egyptians and Chinese have archived games which date back to far before the year zero. Games can be categorized according to different dimensions. Three examples are:

(1) the number of players,

(2) whether chance is involved, and

(3) how many information a player has.

With the upcoming of computers human beings were tempted to let the computer play those games. The reason why scientists are interested in research on board games is that the rules of games are mostly exact and well defined which makes it easy to translate them to a program that is suitable for a computer to run (Van den Herik, 1983). The research in board games obtained a huge impulse in 1944 when Von Neumann republished his article about the minimax algorithm (Von Neumann, 1928) together with Morgenstern in the book “Theory of Games and Economic Behavior” (Von Neumann and Morgenstern, 1944). These ideas were picked up by Shannon (1950) and Turing (1953) who tried to let a computer play Chess as intelligently as possible. Since then much research is performed on new methods, on a variety of games (Murray, 1952) and on other problems to make the computer a worthy opponent for the human player (Schaeffer and Van den Herik, 2002). One field in this area of research are the board games which have full information and are played by two persons. Chess is the classical example of this kind of a game and a great deal of effort has been devoted in the past to the construction of a good chess player. The most pregnant success so far in this area was the result when Deep Blue achieved to win against world chess champion Garry Kasparov (Newborn, 1996).

   Related Questions in Basic Statistics

  • Q : Develop the most appropriate regression

    Predicting Courier Costs The law firm of Adams, Babcock, and Connors is located in the Dallas-Fort metroplex.  Randall Adams is the senior and founding partner of the firm.  John Babcock has been a partne

  • Q : Principles of data analysis For the

    For the data analysis project, you will address some questions that interest you with the statistical methodology we are learning in class. You choose the questions; you decide how to collect data; you do the analyses. The questions can address almost any topic,

  • Q : Compare the test results The grade

    The grade point averages of 61 students who completed a college course in financial accounting have a standard deviation of .790. The grade point averages of 17 students who dropped out of the same course have a standard deviation of .940. Do the data indicate a

  • Q : Computers playing games How Computers

    How Computers playing games can be categorized according to different dimensions?

  • Q : What is Forced Flow Law Forced Flow Law

    Forced Flow Law: • The forced flow law captures the relationship between the various components in the system. It states that the throughputs or flows, in all parts of a system must be proportional t

  • Q : Explain Queuing theory Queuing theory :

    Queuing theory: • Queuing theory deals with the analysis of lines where customers wait to receive a service:

    Q : Assumptions in Queuing system

    Assumptions in Queuing system: • Flow balance implies that the number of arrivals in an observation period is equal to the

  • Q : Define Utilization Law Utilization Law

    Utilization Law: • ρk = XK . SK = X . DK • Utilization of a resource is the fraction

  • Q : Report on Simple Random Sampling with

    One of my friend has a problem on simple random sampling. Can someone provide a complete Report on Simple Random Sampling with or without replacement?

  • Q : Help An experiment is conducted in

    An experiment is conducted in which 60 participants each fill out a personality test, but not according to the way they see themselves. Instead, 20 are randomly assigned to fill it out according to the way they think a parent sees them (i.e. how a parent would fill it out to describe the participant