Each answer must be a minimum of 250 words.
#1. Using a minimum of three scholarly sources, identify a case that was significantly impacted by an issue involving personal, professional, and/or scientific credibility. State the nature of the allegation of ethical misconduct and the impact it had on the use of evidence at trial. The case may demonstrate a positive, neutral, or negative impact. Analyze how the personal, professional, and/or scientific credibility of your selected example is scrutinized, the impact that such scrutiny has on the value and weight of evidence, as well as its admissibility in court. Properly cite any references using APA style.
#2. Popular media has perpetrated a number of common myths that influence the public perception of forensics. In this discussion, you will look at how these myths differ from reality and the impact that has throughout the investigation and at trial. Using a minimum of three scholarly or credible source of information. Support your claims with examples and properly cite any references in APA format
You will be assigned a role as outlined below, and, based on this role, provide at least one recommendation for managing perceptions and addressing misconceptions.
Your role is that of a prosecutor defending actual technology and scientific methodology to manage public perception of forensics for a trial. How would you educate the jury?