Assignment: This week, you will submit an outline and thesis statement for your informative paper.
When you write an informative essay that presents two sides of an issue without revealing bias, there are three primary organizational tactics that can be used: Need Assignment Help?
- Present all the major arguments on one side of the issue, and then present all the major arguments of the opposing viewpoint.
- Present one of the major issues relating to the overarching topic, and in the same paragraph, discuss the viewpoints of both sides on this particular issue.
- In one paragraph, present one of the viewpoints on one major aspect of the controversy, and then follow that paragraph with another paragraph presenting the opposing views' arguments related to the same aspect of the controversy. You then repeat that pattern one to three more times.
For this assignment:
1. Use the outline template and one of the strategies listed above to organize the materials for your paper.
2. Use specific quotes or cited evidence in APA style format for your supporting details.
3. Develop a concise thesis statement that clearly and accurately presents the main idea you will develop in your paper.
The Use of Euthanasia (Assisted Dying) In Medical Care: An Annotated Bibliography
Braun, E. (2023). An autonomy-based approach to assisted suicide: a way to avoid the expressivist objection against assisted dying laws. Journal of Medical Ethics, 49(7), 497- 501.
Braun believes that basing assisted suicide solely on personal autonomy - but not medical suffering - does not stigmatize individuals with disabilities or illness. This is supported by the 2020 ruling by the German Federal Constitutional Court, which stated that assisted suicide was a right to self-determination not limited by diagnosis. The article is an ethics research paper by a researcher at Ruhr University Bochum in the peer-reviewed Journal of Medical Ethics. The article has been peer-reviewed externally, and it thoroughly interacts with the known philosophical and legal literature. The article offers a solid philosophical and legal premise to the arguments of patient autonomy in cases of assisted dying in medical situations. One article to use in the paper is "The right to a self determined death, as an expression of personal freedom, is not limited to situations defined by external causes" (P.499).
Leboul, D., Bousquet, A., Chassagne, A., Mathieu-Nicot, F., Ridley, A., Cretin, E., ... & Aubry, R. (2022). Understanding why patients request euthanasia when it is illegal: a qualitative study in palliative care units on the personal and practical impact of euthanasia requests. Palliative care and social practice, 16, 26323524211066925.
The research interviewed 18 terminally ill French patients and discovered that euthanasia requests fulfilled five functions, including recognizing suffering, regaining autonomy, influencing care, transgressing prohibition, and imagining a self-determined future. The research also discovered that superior symptom management tended to put a temporary hold on the requests. This is a registered clinical trial that is ethics-committee-approved and undertaken by a multidisciplinary team of PhD-qualified professionals in 11 palliative care units. The article has been published in the peer-reviewed journal Palliative Care and Social Practice (SAGE). The study includes first-hand patient testimony of the connection between euthanasia requests and unmet needs in autonomy and dignity in medical care, which is a strong argument in favor of the legalization of euthanasia. One quote that will be used in the essay is, "request for euthanasia appears to be a willful means to remove oneself from the impasse of an existence paralyzed by suffering" (P.1).
Lee, M. A. (2023). Ethical issue of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care, 26(2), 95.
Lee maintains that physician-assisted suicide is inconsistent with the healing mission of medicine, that popular opinion in support of it distorts the actual desires of terminally ill patients, and that suffering is not a deprivation of human dignity. The article supports the idea of a more robust palliative care over the legalization of the procedures that end life.
This article was written by Dr. Myung Ah Lee who is a medical oncologist at the Seoul St. Mary Hospital, Catholic University of Korea and has verified ORCID credentials and extensive clinical experience. The article was published in a peer-reviewed journal. This article includes an ethical argument by a clinician that euthanasia does not fit the main mission of medical care and thus is crucial to the other side of the discussion The essay ill use the quote, "However, the act of using medical care to artificially end a life that has become as to wish for death does not preserve human dignity, rather than a kind of homicide" (P.99).
Rahimian, Z., Rahimian, L., Lopez-Castroman, J., Ostovarfar, J., Fallahi, M. J., Nayeri, M. A., & Vardanjani, H. M. (2024). What medical conditions lead to a request for euthanasia? A rapid scoping review. Health Science Reports, 7(3), e1978.
This review examined 197 studies and discovered that terminal cancer (45.4%), dementia (19.8%), and treatment-resistant psychiatric disorders (12.2%) are some of the most common conditions that prompt euthanasia requests, and there is no international agreement on the eligibility criteria used across jurisdictions. It is a PRISMA-ScR compliant scoping review with two independent extractions published in the peerreviewed journal Health Science Reports (Wiley) by a multinational team of researchers based at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. The present review records that euthanasia is now expanding to non-terminal and psychiatric conditions, with evidence based arguments against why euthanasia should not be legalized in medical practice. The paper will use the quote, "Clinicians are less inclined to recommend or perform euthanasia for patients suffering from psychiatric diseases than for patients with life threatening somatic illnesses."
Informative Essay Outline Template:
When you write an informative essay that presents two sides of an issue without revealing bias, there are three primary organizational tactics that can be used:
1. Present all the major arguments on one side of the issue, and then present all the major arguments of the opposing viewpoint.
2. Present one of the major issues relating to the overarching topic, and in the same paragraph, discuss the viewpoints of both sides on this particular issue.
3. In one paragraph, present one of the viewpoints on one major aspect of the controversy, and then follow that paragraph with another paragraph presenting the opposing views' arguments related to the same aspect of the controversy.
You then repeat that pattern one to three more times.
4. Make sure to use specific quotes or cited evidence for your supporting details. Cite the author and year after.
Carefully consider these options, choose one, and continue with this organizational strategy for your entire essay.
You may use the below outline template:
I. Introduction
a. Hook:
b. Thesis statement:
II. Body Paragraph 1
a. Topic Sentence:
i. Supporting detail 1:
ii. Supporting detail 2:
iii. Supporting detail 3:
III. Body Paragraph 2
a. Topic Sentence:
i. Supporting detail 1:
ii. Supporting detail 2:
iii. Supporting detail 3:
IV. Conclusion
a. Transition:
b. Restatement of thesis