Write an analytical report to Purpose People credited with this unit standard are able to plan, write, and evaluate the effectiveness of an analytical report.
Classification Communication Skills Writing
Explanatory notes
1 This unit standard is one of a series of unit standards for report writing:
Write an incident report, level 1
Write a short report, level 2
Write a report, level 3
Present a reasoned argument in a report, level 4
Write an analytical report, level 5.
2 Definitions
Audience means the person or people for whom the report is written.
Organisational requirements refer to organisational policies and procedures, and include any ethical and legal requirements relevant to the organisation.
3 This unit standard can be assessed against in a classroom context and/or in a workplace or other context using naturally occurring evidence.
Where naturally occurring evidence is used for assessment against this unit standard, a verifier's checklist is acceptable if accompanied by evidence that includes examples from the candidate's performance.
4 Assessment against this unit standard must take place after the candidate has edited and proof read the document.
5 For assessment, the report must be at least 1500 words.
Outcomes and evidence requirements
Outcome 1
Plan the analytical report.
Evidence requirements
1.1 The purpose, audience and scope of the report are determined and documented.
1.2 Information is selected, analysed, and organised into a structure that fits the purpose of the report.
Outcome 2
Write the analytical report.
Evidence requirements
2.1 Report is consistent with the purpose and organisational requirements.
Range report may include but is not limited to - executive summary, abstract, terms of reference, introduction, discussion, findings, conclusions, recommendations, glossary, references, appendices; evidence of at least five is required.
2.2 The language throughout the report is appropriate for the audience.
Range language includes - spelling, punctuation, tone, vocabulary, grammar, syntax.
2.3 Findings are presented in a format that matches the data and the audience.
Range presentation may include but is not limited to - tables, graphs, text, diagrams.
2.4 Report is written without bias.
2.5 Conclusions and/or inferences drawn are consistent with findings.
2.6 Any recommendations made are consistent with the purpose, scope, findings, and conclusions.
2.7 Report format is in accordance with the purpose and organisational requirements.
Outcome 3
Evaluate the effectiveness of the analytical report.
Evidence requirements
3.1 Audience feedback on the report is sought and used to identify any possible refinements for future reports.
Consent and Moderation Requirements (CMR) reference 0023
This CMR can be accessed at https://www.nzqa.govt.nz/framework/search/index.do.
Please note
Providers must be granted consent to assess against standards (accredited) by NZQA, before they can report credits from assessment against unit standards or deliver courses of study leading to that assessment.
Industry Training Organisations must be granted consent to assess against standards by NZQA before they can register credits from assessment against unit standards.
Providers and Industry Training Organisations, which have been granted consent and which are assessing against unit standards must engage with the moderation system that applies to those standards.
Requirements for consent to assess and an outline of the moderation system that applies to this standard are outlined in the Consent and Moderation Requirements (CMR). The CMR also includes useful information about special requirements for organisations wishing to develop education and training programmes, such as minimum qualifications for tutors and assessors, and special resource requirements.
Comments on this unit standard
Please contact NZQA National Qualifications Services [email protected] if you wish to suggest changes to the content of this unit standard.