Question: Critical Legal Thinking. Suppose that a franchisor requires the franchisee to purchase a particular type of van that will be used to deliver the franchised carpet-cleaning services to the public. If the van is involved in an accident that causes injury to a person, should the franchisor be held liable for the injuries? What are the arguments for and against holding the franchisor liable under the circumstances? Would it be better if the law established a clear rule regarding the degree of control a franchisor must exert before being subjected to liability for the franchisee's actions? Why or why not?